The furniture business is highly competitive, which makes a company’s information about designs and fabrics very valuable. Thrive indicates in its suit that the former employees stole design information for 20 types of sofas, 47 types of chairs, 28 types of tables and desks, 19 designs of credenzas and other furniture for storage, 5 types of beds to start Joybird Furniture. To accomplish this, Thrive alleges that the defendants misappropriated Thrive’s database of computer design files, engineering schematics, frame designs, and fabric designs. Stitch allegedly began making identical pieces of furniture shortly before or soon after Stormer, Stellin, Hinostroza, and Del Toro left Thrive. In particular, Thrive’s complaint outlines how it spends many man-hours developing its furniture designs by use of a shared computer network and computer-aided design (CAD) system. Using this system, the company’s designers create initial designs, which are then developed into actual pieces of furniture. Using a computer network that can be accessed by mobile devices, employees may comment on the initial designs, leading to revisions. Further work in preparation of a final product includes frame design and such final touches as selection of hardware and fabrics. Fabric designs and patterns are especially valuable because well-designed fabric patterns waste a minimum of fabric. Completed designs, in turn, are turned into engineering schematics and computer files that are to be used in the automated construction of the furniture. According to Thrive, Stormer, Stellin, Hinostroza, and Del Toro unfairly benefitted from a conservatively estimated 23,800 man-hours of design and development by appropriating an estimated 80 percent of Thrive’s computerized designs and fabric patterns for use on Joybird Furniture furnishing offerings.
After the independent designer of the Joybird website (which the defendants ostensibly were creating for their employer) alerted Thrive, it began to monitor the employees’ activities at work. These allegedly included the development of the Joybird website and the copying of Thrive’s designs and computer files. The Joybird website was launched in January 2014. Thrive claims that even after leaving the company, the defendants continued to steal from Thrive by accessing Thrive’s computer system without authorization.
One example of this alleged theft is Thrive’s highly valuable and confidential list of customers and potential customers. Thrive claims that the four stole Thrive’s client data to develop their competing business. In one instance in 2014, Thrive watched as four customer requests for packets of fabric swatches — each a promising lead worth approximately $350 — were deleted from its computers. Thrive claims that shortly after the Joybird defendants left the company toward the end of 2013, requests for fabric packets dropped from about 80 per week to 10. As another example of the four’s tampering with Thrive’s computer system, the company’s complaint indicates that soon after the four left Thrive at the end of 2013, Thrive discovered that its fabric CNC machine had stopped working because the computer files it used to create its products had been deleted. According to the complaint, roughly 80 percent of Thrive’s hard copies of its engineering schematics, frame designs, and fabric designs also were discovered to be missing after Stormer, Stellin, Hinostroza, and Del Toro left the company.
In addition, the former employees are accused of creating a back door with which to access Thrive’s computers, copy and delete information, and even prevent Thrive from fully accessing its own computer network. Thrive says that to this day, it cannot access all of its computer systems because the defendants have not revealed the passwords that they changed before leaving the company.
Thrive claims that Joshua Stellin, Andres Hinostroza, Alejandro Andres Del Toro aka Alex Del Toro, the Joybird defendants, breached their employment agreements, in which they agreed to work solely for the benefit of their employer and to refrain from engaging in any other business activities that were directly competitive with the employer. Christopher Stormer, Former COO, had immense fudiciary responsibility. Thrive also claims that the former employees violated their confidentiality agreements by accessing, copying, and deleting Thrive’s customer information on behalf of their own enterprise. The former employees are being sued for breach of their duty of loyalty, breach of their fiduciary duties, breach of confidentiality, interference with Thrive’s economic advantage, and unfair competition. Thrive is seeking to establish ownership of the Joybird website, obtain restitution in excess of $33,000,000, an injunction preventing Stormer, Stellin, Hinostroza, and Del Toro from further violations of California’s unfair competition law, and an award of punitive damages.
Christopher Stormer
Joshua Stellin
Andres Hinostroza
Alejandro Andres Del Toro aka Alex Del Toro
www.Joybird.com
Contact Info:
Name: Joybird
Email: Send Email
Organization: Joybird
Website: http://www.Joybird.com
Release ID: 338067