Carnegie & Rockefeller Subverted Cancer Treatment For Profit Via Philanthropy releases a controversial article titled "Did Carnegie Subvert The Path Of Cancer Treatment?", which may cause upset amongst Mainstream Medical Profession. More information and the article itself can be found at

Mamazura has released a potentially controversial article “Carnegie & Rockefeller Subverted Cancer Treatment For Profit Via Philanthropy” bringing some cause for concern, as the article may upset Government funded and established medical industries – not to mention the foundations associated with the two industrialists.

In the 125th anniversary year of Carnegie Hall, the 752 words article asks the question: “Carnegie & Rockefeller Subverted Cancer Treatment For Profit Via Philanthropy” in the pursuit of providing a seldom voiced perspective which altered the trajectory of cancer healing for the general population/health and fitness enthusiasts/cancer patients/parents/healthy eaters and worried well alike. The question of cancer as a survival mechanism is another little-known concept flagged in the article. This topic of natural healing and the worrying reports of monetary gain by big business within the cancer industry provides a certain element of the article which is set to spark discontent amongst the Mainstream Medical Profession.

In the 125th Anniversary Year of Carnegie Hall, below is a portion of the piece, which neatly exemplifies the controversial element:

Large donations were made to major US universities by Carnegie and Rockefeller, who had recently added pharmaceuticals to their business portfolis. The ‘price’ was ‘standardised’ medical text books omitting nutrition and herbal medicine. Today, nutrition is given little importance in the training of our doctors and health professionals because age-old wisdom of herb and plant medicine was denounced as ‘quackery’. Hippocrates said: “Let food be thy medicine” and we have all suffered for not heeding this tenet.

Despite recognised clinical trials at Harvard Universtiy and other respected research centers, there is still serious opposition when it comes to natural healing – largely because herbs and plants cannot be patented – limiting the amount of profit which can be made by drug companies.

A spokesperson for mamazura, Maria Trevelyan, says “Of course, never sets out to intentionally upset anybody. The aim of our articles is first and foremost to open up debate on areas of health which are not divulged to the public well enough as an option – naturopathic and holistic protocols are not offered and mainstream medicine often actively seeks to dispel or denegrate this approach. It is critical, however, that we stay dedicated to our true voice.

Although our article might unsettle mainstream medical practitioners and the cancer industry, it is our duty to our readers and the general public to get this iinformation out. We believe it’s more important to tell the truth, however unwelcome and give people more options – and more hope, in many cases, when it comes to cancer. Facts, research and helpful information have been systematcally ignored, suppressed and derided for decades – to the detriment of public health. We understand that we will not please everyone – but that is not our aim.”

Although there has been no backlash as of yet, the possibility exists as the article exposes the US cancer industry as the only one where commissions are paid to oncologists and doctors for prescribing cancer related drugs. is a relatively new provider of in depth articles in the Health/Wellbeing/Anti-Cancer market but is committed to providing help, hope and inspirational healing to all people – and particularly those affected by cancer – of which, there are increasing numbers – more than half a million in the US alone in 2016. has stated the future aims for the website are to raise awareness of how mainstream medicine is not serving public health as well as it might – they are missing or deliberately ignoring good information, sometimes for the sake of profit and not wanting to ‘rock the boat’ in terms of established systems – many of which ar inter-dependent on the status quo being protected. So hopes any controversy will pass quickly and re-emphasizes no offence is or was intended.’s complete article can be found at

Release ID: 100845